Reverse Kelly Concepts

Always interested in any new idea and wouldn’t mind knowing (even roughly) how Kelly works – never heard of it. I suspect won’t suit me, but would like to hear more. Thanks

Sheila

[Reply]

I shall see what I can do, because the method is copyrighted I don’t know how much I am allowed to give away. I shall investigate though.

[Reply]

I would be very interested in seeing the above method.

[Reply]

Would like to hear more.
I compromise using % of bank betting.
I increase stakes on a winner but hold the latest level of staking when I lose

[Reply]

could this be the breakthrough we are all looking for ?
very interesting – ……..cheers ………Peter

[Reply]

Would be keen on seeing more )

[Reply]

sounds like a good idear.

[Reply]

Correct me if I am wrong, but surely using a % of Bank staking plan is not the same as using Kelly.

Also the reasons for using a % of bank staking plan rather than flat stakes is two fold:

1. Over a long series of bets with longer winning sequences than losing sequences, the Bank will grow faster than if using flat stakes at the same initial size. So it is good for many Laying systems – especially when used in a Liability rather than stake manner.

2. Using a % of Bank staking plan also protects you from being wiped out by an unusually long losing sequence. This is because as you continue to lose, you are progressively making smaller bets. This makes it suitable for Backing Systems where the odds are substantially greater than evens.

[Reply]

Souinds interesting as only use % of my bank for all my bettting.

Stu

[Reply]

My heads a bit frazzled think of it

More complete info on the concept would be good.

Loss recovery style staking for example you are effectively increasing the % of bankroll used on a bet following a loser or string of losers. The very rough core priciple of that is matched above. The danger there is total blow out at a faster point than would be hit by levels , which in turn is faster than staking which is a proporation of bankroll size. Total blow out is one thing traditional % bank style betting theoretically protects you against. ( in reality of course turning £1000 into £1 is effective blowout. )

Staking plan optimisation in general..one of those things easier to do if you have a lot of past
history to examine.

The choice of shoe must fit the foot etc

Further expansion a good idea however.

Cheers
Mick

[Reply]

This sounds like an interesting concept. Would like to learn more.

[Reply]

I think that would be a good idear

Jack

[Reply]

sounds very intersting

regards
john

[Reply]

Definately worth a look-see

[Reply]

I would certainly be interested in seeing the kelly or percentage money management method.

[Reply]

Very interested. I am from Australia and this has been always been a concern to me – investing high on losses and low on wins. Bring it on.

[Reply]

Hi Michael

Yes I would like to know more about this method, it would seem that what is being stated makes sense.

Cheers
Billy

[Reply]

This is something I would be most interested in.

[Reply]

Hi,
Would be very interested to know more, in particular the effect of long losing runs.
Mike

[Reply]

I would be interested. Incidently is David Schwartz the same person who is known as the stock market historian and writes in the Times etc?

[Reply]

Hi Michael

Sounds very interesting,I would be interested in getting hold of this.

Acap

[Reply]

Hi,
Very interesting, i like to look at staking plans as it is an important part of my betting once i get my selections, punters often overlook the inportance of the correct staking, so this theory has got me thinking which has to be good!, i look forward & welcome any new staking plans.

[Reply]